
RRNLs Project Showcase
Reference Range Number Lines
To evaluate our specification approach in a realistic setting, we are replicating the study “Graphics help patients distinguish between urgent and non-urgent deviations in laboratory test results” by recreating its stimuli and adapting the workflow for a modern online experiment.
Published Study
We are replicating a prior research study on patient interpretation of lab result graphics.
D3 Recreation
The original graphs are being recreated as closely as possible with D3.
ReVISit.dev
The online study is being configured and deployed through ReVISit.
Prolific
Participants are being recruited through Prolific for the live study.
Why this paper matters
[write about why the zikmund fisher study matters and what it tells us]
[connect the study to our project]
Study questions
Users were asked the following question sets during the study.
Not at all
Very
1
2
3
4
5
6
Not at all
Very
1
2
3
4
5
6
Nothing
Talk to your doctor about this test result at your next regular appointment
Ask to see your doctor at the first available appointment
Go to a hospital or your doctor’s office tomorrow
Go to a hospital as soon as you can get free later today
Go to a hospital immediately
Not well at all
Extremely well
1
2
3
4
5
Not at all helpful
Extremely helpful
1
2
3
4
5
Definitely no
Definitely yes
1
2
3
4
5
Do not trust at all
Trust completely
1
2
3
4
5
Read-only preview
This section uses the current Vega-based editor in a read-only configuration as a specification-oriented companion to the replication work. A dedicated D3 viewer can be added later as the recreated stimuli are finalized.
Edit the HTML directly.
Edit the HTML directly.